Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The Show Cause Notice (SCN) issued after more than ten years is time-barred, exceeding the extended period of limitation of five years provided u/s 28. The proposals in the SCN do not fall within the scope of Section 124, which allows notice for confiscation of goods and imposition of penalty. The only proposal falling u/s 124 is the imposition of penalty u/s 114, which cannot be sustained as there is no proposal to confiscate export goods or hold them liable for confiscation u/s 113, a prerequisite for imposing penalty u/s 114. The remaining proposals in the SCN fall beyond the scope of any SCN issued u/s 124. The Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) is mentioned.
The Show Cause Notice (SCN) issued after more than ten years is time-barred, exceeding the extended period of limitation of five years provided u/s 28. The proposals in the SCN do not fall within the scope of Section 124, which allows notice for confiscation of goods and imposition of penalty. The only proposal falling u/s 124 is the imposition of penalty u/s 114, which cannot be sustained as there is no proposal to confiscate export goods or hold them liable for confiscation u/s 113, a prerequisite for imposing penalty u/s 114. The remaining proposals in the SCN fall beyond the scope of any SCN issued u/s 124. The Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) is mentioned.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
