Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The Court held that when a company fails to register a charge as mandated u/s 77 of the Companies Act, 2013, insisting on digital signatures from the company itself while filing Form CHG-1 u/s 78 for charge registration would contradict the very purpose of Section 78, which is designed to address such lapse or refusal by the company. The instructions for Form CHG-1 do not accommodate situations where the company's cooperation cannot be presumed. Therefore, the requirement for digital signatures from the company should not be insisted upon while filing Form CHG-1 u/s 78 when the company defaults on its statutory duty u/s 77. The High Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the view that digital signatures from the company need not be mandated in such circumstances.
The Court held that when a company fails to register a charge as mandated u/s 77 of the Companies Act, 2013, insisting on digital signatures from the company itself while filing Form CHG-1 u/s 78 for charge registration would contradict the very purpose of Section 78, which is designed to address such lapse or refusal by the company. The instructions for Form CHG-1 do not accommodate situations where the company's cooperation cannot be presumed. Therefore, the requirement for digital signatures from the company should not be insisted upon while filing Form CHG-1 u/s 78 when the company defaults on its statutory duty u/s 77. The High Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the view that digital signatures from the company need not be mandated in such circumstances.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
