Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Petitioner sought regular bail, contending false implication and non-impleadment of main accused. Petitioner underwent 11 months and 26 days of custody, with another case pending on bail. Charges framed u/ss 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC and Section 132 CGST Act, 2017. Court observed that out of 12 prosecution witnesses, only 3 examined till date, and further detention would violate Article 21's right to speedy trial, as per Dataram Singh case. Deprivation of liberty without speedy trial inconsistent with Article 21, as per Abdul Rehman Antulay case. Veracity of allegations to be established during trial. Only 3 witnesses examined despite charges framed, rendering further incarceration purposeless. Without commenting on merits, bail granted subject to conditions, applying "bail is rule, jail exception" principle.
Petitioner sought regular bail, contending false implication and non-impleadment of main accused. Petitioner underwent 11 months and 26 days of custody, with another case pending on bail. Charges framed u/ss 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC and Section 132 CGST Act, 2017. Court observed that out of 12 prosecution witnesses, only 3 examined till date, and further detention would violate Article 21's right to speedy trial, as per Dataram Singh case. Deprivation of liberty without speedy trial inconsistent with Article 21, as per Abdul Rehman Antulay case. Veracity of allegations to be established during trial. Only 3 witnesses examined despite charges framed, rendering further incarceration purposeless. Without commenting on merits, bail granted subject to conditions, applying "bail is rule, jail exception" principle.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
