Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Petitioner sought regular bail, contending false implication and non-impleadment of main accused. Petitioner underwent 11 months and 26 days of custody, with another case pending on bail. Charges framed u/ss 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC and Section 132 CGST Act, 2017. Court observed that out of 12 prosecution witnesses, only 3 examined till date, and further detention would violate Article 21's right to speedy trial, as per Dataram Singh case. Deprivation of liberty without speedy trial inconsistent with Article 21, as per Abdul Rehman Antulay case. Veracity of allegations to be established during trial. Only 3 witnesses examined despite charges framed, rendering further incarceration purposeless. Without commenting on merits, bail granted subject to conditions, applying "bail is rule, jail exception" principle.
Petitioner sought regular bail, contending false implication and non-impleadment of main accused. Petitioner underwent 11 months and 26 days of custody, with another case pending on bail. Charges framed u/ss 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC and Section 132 CGST Act, 2017. Court observed that out of 12 prosecution witnesses, only 3 examined till date, and further detention would violate Article 21's right to speedy trial, as per Dataram Singh case. Deprivation of liberty without speedy trial inconsistent with Article 21, as per Abdul Rehman Antulay case. Veracity of allegations to be established during trial. Only 3 witnesses examined despite charges framed, rendering further incarceration purposeless. Without commenting on merits, bail granted subject to conditions, applying "bail is rule, jail exception" principle.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
