Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
This is a judgment by the High Court granting regular bail to the petitioner accused of offenses u/ss 420, 467, 468, 471 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 132(1)(b) and (c) of the HGST Act, 2017, related to wrongful availment and utilization of Input Tax Credit (ITC). The court considered that the petitioner has already undergone substantial incarceration, co-accused have been granted bail, and the trial is likely to take considerable time. The court relied on the principles of criminal jurisprudence, the right to a speedy trial under Article 21 of the Constitution, and the need to minimize pre-conviction detention. The court also cited precedents emphasizing that bail is the general rule, and denial of bail should not be based solely on pending cases or convictions. Consequently, the petitioner was directed to be released on regular bail upon furnishing bail and surety bonds to the satisfaction of the trial court or duty magistrate.
This is a judgment by the High Court granting regular bail to the petitioner accused of offenses u/ss 420, 467, 468, 471 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 132(1)(b) and (c) of the HGST Act, 2017, related to wrongful availment and utilization of Input Tax Credit (ITC). The court considered that the petitioner has already undergone substantial incarceration, co-accused have been granted bail, and the trial is likely to take considerable time. The court relied on the principles of criminal jurisprudence, the right to a speedy trial under Article 21 of the Constitution, and the need to minimize pre-conviction detention. The court also cited precedents emphasizing that bail is the general rule, and denial of bail should not be based solely on pending cases or convictions. Consequently, the petitioner was directed to be released on regular bail upon furnishing bail and surety bonds to the satisfaction of the trial court or duty magistrate.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
