Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
This case deals with the taxability of compensation paid to landowners for land acquisition. The court held that u/s 96 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (2013 Act), the compensation paid to land-losers is exempted from income tax levy. However, this exemption is not available to those whose lands were acquired under other statutes like the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act 1966. The court observed that this creates an apparent hostile discrimination against land-losers under other statutes, as the compensation package under the 2013 Act is more attractive. The court urged the Central Government to address this issue and extend the tax exemption benefit to all land-losers, regardless of the statute under which their land was acquired, to assuage the grievance of land-losing farmers. The appeals were allowed, and the writ petitions of land-losers were dismissed.
This case deals with the taxability of compensation paid to landowners for land acquisition. The court held that u/s 96 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (2013 Act), the compensation paid to land-losers is exempted from income tax levy. However, this exemption is not available to those whose lands were acquired under other statutes like the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act 1966. The court observed that this creates an apparent hostile discrimination against land-losers under other statutes, as the compensation package under the 2013 Act is more attractive. The court urged the Central Government to address this issue and extend the tax exemption benefit to all land-losers, regardless of the statute under which their land was acquired, to assuage the grievance of land-losing farmers. The appeals were allowed, and the writ petitions of land-losers were dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.