Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The High Court quashed the impugned orders, holding that Section 206AA, mandating 20% TDS rate for invalid PAN, was not applicable. The vendor had linked his PAN with Aadhaar by paying late fee, rendering his PAN valid. The petitioners remitted payment against vendor's valid PAN and filed Form 26QB mentioning the same. The departmental website accepted the filing without indicating PAN invalidity. Thus, deducting TDS at 20% rate by deeming vendor's PAN invalid was contrary to facts and violated natural justice principles.
The High Court quashed the impugned orders, holding that Section 206AA, mandating 20% TDS rate for invalid PAN, was not applicable. The vendor had linked his PAN with Aadhaar by paying late fee, rendering his PAN valid. The petitioners remitted payment against vendor's valid PAN and filed Form 26QB mentioning the same. The departmental website accepted the filing without indicating PAN invalidity. Thus, deducting TDS at 20% rate by deeming vendor's PAN invalid was contrary to facts and violated natural justice principles.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.