Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The case pertains to the applicability of Section 43CA, which deals with the adoption of stamp duty value as the full value of consideration for computing profits and gains from the transfer of immovable property. The assessee executed an agreement for sale of a flat on 30/04/2011, with earnest money paid on 26/04/2011. However, the agreement was registered in the subsequent assessment year. The Assessing Officer (AO) adopted the stamp duty value on the date of registration, leading to a higher value than the agreement value. The CIT(A) held that since there was only one registered sale agreement executed during the year under consideration, the stamp duty value as on the date of the agreement should be adopted as the deemed sale consideration. The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s order, directing the AO to compute profits and gains by considering the stamp duty value as on 30/04/2011, the date of the agreement for sale, in accordance with Section 43CA(3). The provisions of Section 43CA(4) were also satisfied since earnest money was paid before the agreement date.
The case pertains to the applicability of Section 43CA, which deals with the adoption of stamp duty value as the full value of consideration for computing profits and gains from the transfer of immovable property. The assessee executed an agreement for sale of a flat on 30/04/2011, with earnest money paid on 26/04/2011. However, the agreement was registered in the subsequent assessment year. The Assessing Officer (AO) adopted the stamp duty value on the date of registration, leading to a higher value than the agreement value. The CIT(A) held that since there was only one registered sale agreement executed during the year under consideration, the stamp duty value as on the date of the agreement should be adopted as the deemed sale consideration. The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s order, directing the AO to compute profits and gains by considering the stamp duty value as on 30/04/2011, the date of the agreement for sale, in accordance with Section 43CA(3). The provisions of Section 43CA(4) were also satisfied since earnest money was paid before the agreement date.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
