Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Ex-parte appellate order passed by CIT(A) based on statement of fact filed by assessee. Second round of litigation regarding whether assessee firm stood dissolved or business discontinued. Disallowance of freight expenses u/s 40(a)(ia). Assessee did not participate in appellate proceedings before CIT(A) for reasons cited in statement of fact. Huge additions made by AO and huge tax demand raised against assessee in second round. Assessee acted negligently during appellate proceedings before CIT(A) but should not be allowed to benefit from its own wrong. CIT(A) passed ex-parte order based on record including statement of fact. Assessee did not comply with CIT(A)'s notices. Act of court should not prejudice anybody. Mandate of 1961 Act is to compute and collect correct taxes. Assessee now arguing against additions before ITAT, filing paper book. Contradictory statements regarding dissolution of firm versus discontinuance of business. Inquiries to be conducted in interest of justice. Appellate order set aside, matter remanded to CIT(A) for fresh adjudication after giving opportunity to both parties u/ss 189(1), 189(3), 189(4) read with Section 176(3).
Ex-parte appellate order passed by CIT(A) based on statement of fact filed by assessee. Second round of litigation regarding whether assessee firm stood dissolved or business discontinued. Disallowance of freight expenses u/s 40(a)(ia). Assessee did not participate in appellate proceedings before CIT(A) for reasons cited in statement of fact. Huge additions made by AO and huge tax demand raised against assessee in second round. Assessee acted negligently during appellate proceedings before CIT(A) but should not be allowed to benefit from its own wrong. CIT(A) passed ex-parte order based on record including statement of fact. Assessee did not comply with CIT(A)'s notices. Act of court should not prejudice anybody. Mandate of 1961 Act is to compute and collect correct taxes. Assessee now arguing against additions before ITAT, filing paper book. Contradictory statements regarding dissolution of firm versus discontinuance of business. Inquiries to be conducted in interest of justice. Appellate order set aside, matter remanded to CIT(A) for fresh adjudication after giving opportunity to both parties u/ss 189(1), 189(3), 189(4) read with Section 176(3).
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
