Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The assessee followed the project completion method for income recognition since inception. The transitional provisions stipulate that for projects commenced before March 31, 2016, but not completed by that date, revenue recognition shall be based on the method regularly followed prior to April 1, 2016. The Assessing Officer's application of the percentage completion method based on ICDS III by partially interpreting it was unjustified. The addition made by the Assessing Officer for the year under consideration by applying the percentage completion method was not justified and was set aside. The assessee's appeal was allowed.
The assessee followed the project completion method for income recognition since inception. The transitional provisions stipulate that for projects commenced before March 31, 2016, but not completed by that date, revenue recognition shall be based on the method regularly followed prior to April 1, 2016. The Assessing Officer's application of the percentage completion method based on ICDS III by partially interpreting it was unjustified. The addition made by the Assessing Officer for the year under consideration by applying the percentage completion method was not justified and was set aside. The assessee's appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
