Bank account freezing requires statutory authority; anti-money-laundering compliance and KYC monitoring do not permit unilateral indefinite restrictio...
Handicraft job work receives concessional GST only for registered principals and predominantly handmade goods; commercial resin articles remain taxabl...
Application for resolution of debt filed u/s 7 was contested on grounds of limitation prescribed under Article 137 of Limitation Act, 1963. Accounts declared non-performing assets on 31.03.2015, but corporate debtor acknowledged liability by making payment of Rs. 2.65 crore in December 2016, restarting limitation period from that date u/ss 18 and 19. Application filed in 2018 was well within three-year limitation period from December 2016 acknowledgement. Tribunal erred in examining limitation issue. Appellate Tribunal set aside impugned order and remanded matter back to Tribunal.
Application for resolution of debt filed u/s 7 was contested on grounds of limitation prescribed under Article 137 of Limitation Act, 1963. Accounts declared non-performing assets on 31.03.2015, but corporate debtor acknowledged liability by making payment of Rs. 2.65 crore in December 2016, restarting limitation period from that date u/ss 18 and 19. Application filed in 2018 was well within three-year limitation period from December 2016 acknowledgement. Tribunal erred in examining limitation issue. Appellate Tribunal set aside impugned order and remanded matter back to Tribunal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4830 
Join Channel 
