Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
The High Court held that the compounding application should be treated as filed on the original date of February 15, 2018, rather than September 24, 2020, as erroneously considered by the respondents. Consequently, the erstwhile 2014 compounding guidelines would apply instead of the 2019 guidelines. The Court directed the respondents to recompute the compounding charges payable by the petitioner based on the 2014 guidelines, considering the application date as February 15, 2018. Upon payment of the recomputed charges, the application shall be processed further in accordance with law.
The High Court held that the compounding application should be treated as filed on the original date of February 15, 2018, rather than September 24, 2020, as erroneously considered by the respondents. Consequently, the erstwhile 2014 compounding guidelines would apply instead of the 2019 guidelines. The Court directed the respondents to recompute the compounding charges payable by the petitioner based on the 2014 guidelines, considering the application date as February 15, 2018. Upon payment of the recomputed charges, the application shall be processed further in accordance with law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
