Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
The High Court set aside the impugned order dated 18.04.2024 passed by the 1st Respondent due to violation of principles of natural justice. The Petitioner was not aware of the show cause notice and reminder notices uploaded on the GST Portal, and no opportunity of personal hearing was provided before passing the order. The Court remanded the matter to the Respondents for fresh consideration, subject to the Petitioner paying 10% of the disputed tax within four weeks and filing their reply/objection along with required documents within two weeks thereafter. The petition was disposed of by way of remand.
The High Court set aside the impugned order dated 18.04.2024 passed by the 1st Respondent due to violation of principles of natural justice. The Petitioner was not aware of the show cause notice and reminder notices uploaded on the GST Portal, and no opportunity of personal hearing was provided before passing the order. The Court remanded the matter to the Respondents for fresh consideration, subject to the Petitioner paying 10% of the disputed tax within four weeks and filing their reply/objection along with required documents within two weeks thereafter. The petition was disposed of by way of remand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.