Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The assessee sought condonation of delay in filing an appeal before the CIT(A)-NFAC, citing illness with Bipolar disorder and residence in USA as reasons for the delay. The CIT(A)-NFAC rejected the assessee's submissions and denied condonation. However, the ITAT, considering the assessee's health condition, condoned the 351-day delay and remitted the matter to the CIT(A)-NFAC for fresh consideration, granting the assessee an opportunity to be heard. The ITAT cautioned the assessee to cooperate promptly, failing which the CIT(A)-NFAC could pass an appropriate order based on available records. The assessee's appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.
The assessee sought condonation of delay in filing an appeal before the CIT(A)-NFAC, citing illness with Bipolar disorder and residence in USA as reasons for the delay. The CIT(A)-NFAC rejected the assessee's submissions and denied condonation. However, the ITAT, considering the assessee's health condition, condoned the 351-day delay and remitted the matter to the CIT(A)-NFAC for fresh consideration, granting the assessee an opportunity to be heard. The ITAT cautioned the assessee to cooperate promptly, failing which the CIT(A)-NFAC could pass an appropriate order based on available records. The assessee's appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.