Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The assessee made investments in two firms by purchasing cold storage units funded by M/s. A.R. Constructions, where the assessee is a managing partner. The source for investment is explained as the amount was transferred from M/s. A.R. Constructions' books to the assessee's capital account in the respective firms through book entries. Therefore, the addition u/s 68 is directed to be deleted. Regarding cash deposits as capital investment in a firm, the assessee failed to explain the source and the period for which cash was held before investment. The burden to explain the source lies on the assessee, and the addition is sustained. Concerning unsecured loans received, the amounts were transferred from bank accounts of respective parties, and the sources were not disputed by the Revenue. Therefore, the addition is deleted. Regarding the addition u/s 56(2)(x) for the gift received from the assessee's father's HUF, the assessee does not fall within the definition of a relative u/s 56. Hence, the addition is sustained.
The assessee made investments in two firms by purchasing cold storage units funded by M/s. A.R. Constructions, where the assessee is a managing partner. The source for investment is explained as the amount was transferred from M/s. A.R. Constructions' books to the assessee's capital account in the respective firms through book entries. Therefore, the addition u/s 68 is directed to be deleted. Regarding cash deposits as capital investment in a firm, the assessee failed to explain the source and the period for which cash was held before investment. The burden to explain the source lies on the assessee, and the addition is sustained. Concerning unsecured loans received, the amounts were transferred from bank accounts of respective parties, and the sources were not disputed by the Revenue. Therefore, the addition is deleted. Regarding the addition u/s 56(2)(x) for the gift received from the assessee's father's HUF, the assessee does not fall within the definition of a relative u/s 56. Hence, the addition is sustained.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
