Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Real estate development company advanced loans to its Indian subsidiary for funding step-down foreign subsidiaries undertaking real estate projects. Interest paid on loans borrowed for advancing such loans was allowed as business expenditure u/s 36(1)(iii). Subsidiary unable to realize interest from foreign subsidiaries due to financial distress and litigation between partners. Assessee decided not to charge interest to protect business interests and principal loan amount. Loans advanced for business purposes, hence interest paid on borrowings admissible u/s 36(1)(iii) despite no interest income during the year. Appellate Tribunal upheld order allowing deduction.
Real estate development company advanced loans to its Indian subsidiary for funding step-down foreign subsidiaries undertaking real estate projects. Interest paid on loans borrowed for advancing such loans was allowed as business expenditure u/s 36(1)(iii). Subsidiary unable to realize interest from foreign subsidiaries due to financial distress and litigation between partners. Assessee decided not to charge interest to protect business interests and principal loan amount. Loans advanced for business purposes, hence interest paid on borrowings admissible u/s 36(1)(iii) despite no interest income during the year. Appellate Tribunal upheld order allowing deduction.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
