Loading...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Highlights - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Income Tax
  • Direct Taxes
  • Benami Property
  • Central GST Laws
  • SGST - State GST Laws
  • Customs
  • FTP - Foreign Trade Policy
  • SEZ - Special Economic Zone
  • FEMA - Foreign Exchange Management
  • Companies Law
  • SEBI - Securities & Exchange Board of India
  • IBC - Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA - Money-Laundering
  • Indian Laws
  • Bill / Finance Bills
  • Wealth Tax
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Month:
---- All Months ----
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ----
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
Relevance Default Date
    Classification of peritoneal dialysis solution upheld under CTH 9018; binding precedent in the assessee's own case controlled the dispute.
    CIRP transparency and disclosure lapses justify rejection of resolution plan despite CoC approval and commercial wisdom
    Manganese ore processing creates concentrate, so the ore-only CVD exemption under Notification No. 04/2006-CE was denied.
    Forensic audit costs and investor restitution measures directed to support asset disposal and digital record transfer
    SVLDRS refund of redemption fine allowed where payment was made only under unlawful departmental insistence.
    Unauthorised trading and vicarious liability: HC upheld award where manipulated trades and broker responsibility were proved.
    Writ jurisdiction yields to statutory appeal where jurisdictional error and natural justice breach are not clearly established.
    Parallel GST proceedings require the same subject matter; distinct periods and allegations kept the later action valid.
    Effective personal hearing is mandatory on request; lack of prior notice vitiated the adjudication order for breach of natural justice.
    Service tax demand on Form 26AS data alone fails where taxability and extended limitation are not lawfully established.
    Proof of actual GST payment required before reimbursement claim can be examined under a government contract.
    Unconstitutional tax levy refund attracts compensatory interest from deposit date until refund, with statutory refund limits inapplicable.
    Natural justice breached when benchmark yield was fixed on undisclosed material; assessment orders were set aside and remanded.
    Transitional input tax credit under Section 140 cannot be denied by reading Section 140(5) to override pre-appointed-day credit carry forward.
    Writ maintainability and statutory pre-deposit: High Court sent the dispute to the functional appellate tribunal.
    Biodegradable bag classification turns on material and actual biodegradability; concessional GST applies only if the bags are truly biodegradable.
    Online coaching classified as training services, not OIDAR, making Rajasthan supplies intra-State for tax purposes.
    Draft assessment order must be served first before final assessment, preserving the taxpayer's DRP objection right.
    Merger of intimation into scrutiny assessment bars section 154 rectification based on an earlier adjustment.
    Reimbursement between project office and head office is a payment to self and not taxable fees for technical services.
❯❯
Maximize Maximize Maximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

+

Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

NOTE:

Highlights
Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
Results Found:
Show All Summaries Hide All Summaries

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
No Records Found

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

whatsapp Join Channel
Showing Results for : Reset Filters

Dispute regarding non-payment/short payment of service tax, tax...

Service Tax Dispute: Short Payment and Evasion Claims Lead to Upheld Penalties and Dismissed Appeal by Tribunal.

Contents
Summary
Note

Note

-

Bookmark

Print

Print

Service Tax November 4, 2024 Case Laws AT
Dispute regarding non-payment/short payment of service tax, tax demand and interest u/ss 73(2) and 75, penalties u/ss 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, and extended period for demand invoked under the proviso to Section 73(1). Both authorities found no fault with non-payment/short payment of service tax. Appellant admitted short payment, differing only on deductions claimed for provident fund amounts, which the adjudicating authority excluded as not part of the present show cause notice. Service tax rightly demanded and confirmed after allowing deductions for services provided before 16.06.2005 and deducting service tax included in gross amount. Appellant aware of providing taxable services, short-paying service tax, issuing invoices indicating payable service tax, and collecting it from service recipients. Appellant did not file ST-3 returns during the entire period, suppressing information with intent to evade taxes. Extended period of limitation and penalties imposed cannot be disputed. Assessee's appeal dismissed by CESTAT (Appellate Tribunal).

Topics

Acts Income Tax