Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Validity of show cause notice u/s 74(1) of CGST Act, 2017 and Section 20 of IGST Act, 2017 for tax evasion and concealment. Parallel proceedings by DGGI, Haryana GST Intelligence Unit, and Assistant Commissioner, CGST. Petitioner alleged excess ITC availed but not reflected in GSTR-2A, indicating wrongful availment. Court held issuance of notice u/s 73 and dropping it does not prevent proceedings u/s 74. While Assistant Commissioner requested tax deposit, DGGI only sought queries; no proceedings initiated u/s 74. Allegations of fraud prima facie reflected in show cause notice. HCL Infotech case distinguished. Petition dismissed, allowing tax authorities to proceed under provisions of the Act.
Validity of show cause notice u/s 74(1) of CGST Act, 2017 and Section 20 of IGST Act, 2017 for tax evasion and concealment. Parallel proceedings by DGGI, Haryana GST Intelligence Unit, and Assistant Commissioner, CGST. Petitioner alleged excess ITC availed but not reflected in GSTR-2A, indicating wrongful availment. Court held issuance of notice u/s 73 and dropping it does not prevent proceedings u/s 74. While Assistant Commissioner requested tax deposit, DGGI only sought queries; no proceedings initiated u/s 74. Allegations of fraud prima facie reflected in show cause notice. HCL Infotech case distinguished. Petition dismissed, allowing tax authorities to proceed under provisions of the Act.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
