Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Transfer pricing and tax deductions upheld on established principles, while employee contributions and warranty provisions returned for fresh examinat...
Captive transfer pricing relies on industrial consumer tariffs, while genuine quotations can benchmark effluent treatment transfers under the Other Me...
Specific tariff classification for ophthalmic instruments and extended limitation principles determine the treatment of duty demands, confiscation, an...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1161 to 1180 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The petitioner's denial of refund of input tax credit debited as a pre-deposit was challenged. The court held that the non-inclusion of freight and pumping charges collected by the petitioner from customers into the taxable value of Ready Mix Concrete (RMC) supplied cannot be grounds for denying refund. The pre-deposit amount debited in returns for the Assessment Years 2015-2016 under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax regime cannot be denied refund invoking a circular, as the substantial questions of law have been answered in favor of the petitioner. The Commercial Tax Department cannot deny refund after accepting pre-deposit through debit in VAT Returns and considering Revision Orders. u/s 142(6)(a) and (b) of the Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax (TNGST) Act, 2017, the pre-deposit amounts must be refunded. The impugned intimations invoking the circular and denying refund are quashed, and the respondents are directed to refund the amount to the petitioner within thirty days.
The petitioner's denial of refund of input tax credit debited as a pre-deposit was challenged. The court held that the non-inclusion of freight and pumping charges collected by the petitioner from customers into the taxable value of Ready Mix Concrete (RMC) supplied cannot be grounds for denying refund. The pre-deposit amount debited in returns for the Assessment Years 2015-2016 under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax regime cannot be denied refund invoking a circular, as the substantial questions of law have been answered in favor of the petitioner. The Commercial Tax Department cannot deny refund after accepting pre-deposit through debit in VAT Returns and considering Revision Orders. u/s 142(6)(a) and (b) of the Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax (TNGST) Act, 2017, the pre-deposit amounts must be refunded. The impugned intimations invoking the circular and denying refund are quashed, and the respondents are directed to refund the amount to the petitioner within thirty days.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.