Cooperative society deposits, member-interest TDS exemption and credit-facility deduction claims require verification through records and supporting e...
Customs jurisdiction over EPCG condition breaches survives export-obligation discharge certificates, requiring alleged fraud and misdeclaration to be ...
Contractual tolerance requires consideration; breach recoveries, qualifying public infrastructure services and road works escape service tax liability...
Personal hearing requirements in GST adjudication were satisfied by prior opportunities and written submissions; appellate limitation received writ-pe...
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 for addition u/s 68 on share premium received by petitioner from Gold Singapore was challenged. Reassessment proceedings initiated primarily due to Gold Singapore not carrying out business activities in Singapore and acting as a conduit for investments in Indian companies. However, in assessment order for AY 2012-13, Assessing Officer accepted the transaction of share application money/share capital received from Gold Singapore without any addition and also accepted the status of the holding company. The identity, creditworthiness of Gold Singapore, and genuineness of the transaction were accepted by the Department while framing assessments for AY 2012-13, 2015-16, and 2020-2021. The transaction of investment of share capital in the petitioner company was examined in subsequent assessment years and accepted in completed assessments/reassessments u/s 143(3). Once the nature and source of receipts were satisfactorily explained/proved and the Assessing Officer did not contradict the explanation/information given by the assessee, there was no cause for initiating reassessment action for the impugned AYs 2008-09 & 2011-12. The impugned notices issued u/s 148 and the proceedings initiated pursuant thereto were quashed, decided in favor of the assessee.
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 for addition u/s 68 on share premium received by petitioner from Gold Singapore was challenged. Reassessment proceedings initiated primarily due to Gold Singapore not carrying out business activities in Singapore and acting as a conduit for investments in Indian companies. However, in assessment order for AY 2012-13, Assessing Officer accepted the transaction of share application money/share capital received from Gold Singapore without any addition and also accepted the status of the holding company. The identity, creditworthiness of Gold Singapore, and genuineness of the transaction were accepted by the Department while framing assessments for AY 2012-13, 2015-16, and 2020-2021. The transaction of investment of share capital in the petitioner company was examined in subsequent assessment years and accepted in completed assessments/reassessments u/s 143(3). Once the nature and source of receipts were satisfactorily explained/proved and the Assessing Officer did not contradict the explanation/information given by the assessee, there was no cause for initiating reassessment action for the impugned AYs 2008-09 & 2011-12. The impugned notices issued u/s 148 and the proceedings initiated pursuant thereto were quashed, decided in favor of the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
