Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Objective characteristics govern magnesium bis-glycinate chelate classification as an amino-acid coordination compound, not a food preparation or anti...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
581 to 600 of 96046 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 for addition u/s 68 on share premium received by petitioner from Gold Singapore was challenged. Reassessment proceedings initiated primarily due to Gold Singapore not carrying out business activities in Singapore and acting as a conduit for investments in Indian companies. However, in assessment order for AY 2012-13, Assessing Officer accepted the transaction of share application money/share capital received from Gold Singapore without any addition and also accepted the status of the holding company. The identity, creditworthiness of Gold Singapore, and genuineness of the transaction were accepted by the Department while framing assessments for AY 2012-13, 2015-16, and 2020-2021. The transaction of investment of share capital in the petitioner company was examined in subsequent assessment years and accepted in completed assessments/reassessments u/s 143(3). Once the nature and source of receipts were satisfactorily explained/proved and the Assessing Officer did not contradict the explanation/information given by the assessee, there was no cause for initiating reassessment action for the impugned AYs 2008-09 & 2011-12. The impugned notices issued u/s 148 and the proceedings initiated pursuant thereto were quashed, decided in favor of the assessee.
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 for addition u/s 68 on share premium received by petitioner from Gold Singapore was challenged. Reassessment proceedings initiated primarily due to Gold Singapore not carrying out business activities in Singapore and acting as a conduit for investments in Indian companies. However, in assessment order for AY 2012-13, Assessing Officer accepted the transaction of share application money/share capital received from Gold Singapore without any addition and also accepted the status of the holding company. The identity, creditworthiness of Gold Singapore, and genuineness of the transaction were accepted by the Department while framing assessments for AY 2012-13, 2015-16, and 2020-2021. The transaction of investment of share capital in the petitioner company was examined in subsequent assessment years and accepted in completed assessments/reassessments u/s 143(3). Once the nature and source of receipts were satisfactorily explained/proved and the Assessing Officer did not contradict the explanation/information given by the assessee, there was no cause for initiating reassessment action for the impugned AYs 2008-09 & 2011-12. The impugned notices issued u/s 148 and the proceedings initiated pursuant thereto were quashed, decided in favor of the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
