Condonation of refiling delay refused where repeated defects, lack of diligence and vague explanations defeated the appeal against resolution plan app...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
4401 to 4420 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Section 234E late fee levy for TDS statements processed u/s 200A challenged. Court observed Section 200A introduced from 01.06.2015, not applicable for assessment years 2012-13, 2013-14. In absence of Section 200A provisions, late fee u/s 234E ought not to have been imposed while processing TDS applications u/s 200A. Consequently, impugned Demand Intimation Letters set aside as liable.
Section 234E late fee levy for TDS statements processed u/s 200A challenged. Court observed Section 200A introduced from 01.06.2015, not applicable for assessment years 2012-13, 2013-14. In absence of Section 200A provisions, late fee u/s 234E ought not to have been imposed while processing TDS applications u/s 200A. Consequently, impugned Demand Intimation Letters set aside as liable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.