Transfer pricing and tax deductions upheld on established principles, while employee contributions and warranty provisions returned for fresh examinat...
Captive transfer pricing relies on industrial consumer tariffs, while genuine quotations can benchmark effluent treatment transfers under the Other Me...
Specific tariff classification for ophthalmic instruments and extended limitation principles determine the treatment of duty demands, confiscation, an...
Integrated golf function determines classification, placing launch monitors and simulators under other golf equipment rather than measuring instrument...
Public servant status under anti-corruption law extends to recognised stock exchange leadership; constitutional and sanction challenges do not succeed...
Acquiescence, homebuyer protection and clean-slate resolution principles prevent landowners from disrupting an integrated project through late termina...
Assessee, a distributor of SIM cards and vouchers for Vodafone Mobile Services Limited, earned commission on sales to retail shops. Cash deposits were considered business receipts reinvested in purchasing new SIM cards and vouchers, with consistent fund rotation reflected in bank statements provided to authorities. CIT(A) erred in treating entire sales as income without considering business turnover and payments to Vodafone. ITAT directed AO to calculate estimated profit at 1% on transactions, quashing addition u/s 69A as source of deposits was established. Interest u/ss 234A, 234B, and 234C was denied due to income below taxable limit. ITAT emphasized careful handling of such cases by AOs as adjudicators and investigators. Assessee's appeal was allowed, providing relief from addition of Rs. 1,51,77,749.
Assessee, a distributor of SIM cards and vouchers for Vodafone Mobile Services Limited, earned commission on sales to retail shops. Cash deposits were considered business receipts reinvested in purchasing new SIM cards and vouchers, with consistent fund rotation reflected in bank statements provided to authorities. CIT(A) erred in treating entire sales as income without considering business turnover and payments to Vodafone. ITAT directed AO to calculate estimated profit at 1% on transactions, quashing addition u/s 69A as source of deposits was established. Interest u/ss 234A, 234B, and 234C was denied due to income below taxable limit. ITAT emphasized careful handling of such cases by AOs as adjudicators and investigators. Assessee's appeal was allowed, providing relief from addition of Rs. 1,51,77,749.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
