Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Transfer pricing and tax deductions upheld on established principles, while employee contributions and warranty provisions returned for fresh examinat...
Captive transfer pricing relies on industrial consumer tariffs, while genuine quotations can benchmark effluent treatment transfers under the Other Me...
Specific tariff classification for ophthalmic instruments and extended limitation principles determine the treatment of duty demands, confiscation, an...
Applicability of Section 64(1) and Section 54F of the Income Tax Act. Section 64(1) allows for the inclusion of a dependent spouse's income in the assessee's taxable income. The Tribunal held that the assessee's wife was dependent, and her income was rightly included in the assessee's return u/s 64(1). Regarding Section 54F, which provides exemption from long-term capital gains on the sale of a residential property if the proceeds are invested in another residential property, the Tribunal held that the investment in two adjacent flats by the assessee's wife qualified as a single residential unit. Therefore, the assessee was eligible for the exemption u/s 54F, despite the amendment restricting it to one residential unit from April 1, 2015. The Tribunal relied on previous judicial precedents and allowed the assessee's appeal.
Applicability of Section 64(1) and Section 54F of the Income Tax Act. Section 64(1) allows for the inclusion of a dependent spouse's income in the assessee's taxable income. The Tribunal held that the assessee's wife was dependent, and her income was rightly included in the assessee's return u/s 64(1). Regarding Section 54F, which provides exemption from long-term capital gains on the sale of a residential property if the proceeds are invested in another residential property, the Tribunal held that the investment in two adjacent flats by the assessee's wife qualified as a single residential unit. Therefore, the assessee was eligible for the exemption u/s 54F, despite the amendment restricting it to one residential unit from April 1, 2015. The Tribunal relied on previous judicial precedents and allowed the assessee's appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
