Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
481 to 500 of 95955 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The assessee trust claimed depreciation on assets, but the documents like balance sheet, income and expenditure account, and depreciation chart were not signed by auditors, chairman or accountant. The issue of depreciation claim requires verification of records to determine if assets were considered for application of income earned. Therefore, the matter was restored to the Assessing Officer to verify records, allow depreciation benefit u/s 11 after granting reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee. Regarding payment to a specified person, there is no provision to add advance given to income. Relying on a case, it was held that when money advanced for an agreement was returned with interest after cancellation, it cannot be treated as violation of Section 13(1)(c). Hence, this ground was allowed. Additions on account of interest-free advances given to various persons were confirmed. It was held that a mere book entry cannot be income unless income has actually resulted. The reduction in income was part of an agreement for a long-term managing agency arrangement, not a gift. Considering the facts and legal position, the additions were upheld.
The assessee trust claimed depreciation on assets, but the documents like balance sheet, income and expenditure account, and depreciation chart were not signed by auditors, chairman or accountant. The issue of depreciation claim requires verification of records to determine if assets were considered for application of income earned. Therefore, the matter was restored to the Assessing Officer to verify records, allow depreciation benefit u/s 11 after granting reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee. Regarding payment to a specified person, there is no provision to add advance given to income. Relying on a case, it was held that when money advanced for an agreement was returned with interest after cancellation, it cannot be treated as violation of Section 13(1)(c). Hence, this ground was allowed. Additions on account of interest-free advances given to various persons were confirmed. It was held that a mere book entry cannot be income unless income has actually resulted. The reduction in income was part of an agreement for a long-term managing agency arrangement, not a gift. Considering the facts and legal position, the additions were upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
