Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
Appellant availed exemption under Sr. No. 108(1) of Notification No. 23/98-Cus, which unconditionally exempts goods without requiring an end-use certificate. Department denied exemption citing CBIC Circular No. 74/1998-Cus mandating end-use certificate, which is ultra vires the Notification as conditions not prescribed therein cannot be imposed through circulars. Tribunal held that in absence of condition for end-use certificate in the Notification, exemption cannot be denied on that ground. Impugned order set aside, appeal allowed.
Appellant availed exemption under Sr. No. 108(1) of Notification No. 23/98-Cus, which unconditionally exempts goods without requiring an end-use certificate. Department denied exemption citing CBIC Circular No. 74/1998-Cus mandating end-use certificate, which is ultra vires the Notification as conditions not prescribed therein cannot be imposed through circulars. Tribunal held that in absence of condition for end-use certificate in the Notification, exemption cannot be denied on that ground. Impugned order set aside, appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
