Authentication of paper assessment orders upheld, while qualifying repairs, consumables and vendor advance write-offs remain deductible business claim...
Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
621 to 640 of 95955 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Appellant availed exemption under Sr. No. 108(1) of Notification No. 23/98-Cus, which unconditionally exempts goods without requiring an end-use certificate. Department denied exemption citing CBIC Circular No. 74/1998-Cus mandating end-use certificate, which is ultra vires the Notification as conditions not prescribed therein cannot be imposed through circulars. Tribunal held that in absence of condition for end-use certificate in the Notification, exemption cannot be denied on that ground. Impugned order set aside, appeal allowed.
Appellant availed exemption under Sr. No. 108(1) of Notification No. 23/98-Cus, which unconditionally exempts goods without requiring an end-use certificate. Department denied exemption citing CBIC Circular No. 74/1998-Cus mandating end-use certificate, which is ultra vires the Notification as conditions not prescribed therein cannot be imposed through circulars. Tribunal held that in absence of condition for end-use certificate in the Notification, exemption cannot be denied on that ground. Impugned order set aside, appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
