Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Page of 4807
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2161 to 2180 of 96140 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Appellant availed exemption under Sr. No. 108(1) of Notification No. 23/98-Cus, which unconditionally exempts goods without requiring an end-use certificate. Department denied exemption citing CBIC Circular No. 74/1998-Cus mandating end-use certificate, which is ultra vires the Notification as conditions not prescribed therein cannot be imposed through circulars. Tribunal held that in absence of condition for end-use certificate in the Notification, exemption cannot be denied on that ground. Impugned order set aside, appeal allowed.
Appellant availed exemption under Sr. No. 108(1) of Notification No. 23/98-Cus, which unconditionally exempts goods without requiring an end-use certificate. Department denied exemption citing CBIC Circular No. 74/1998-Cus mandating end-use certificate, which is ultra vires the Notification as conditions not prescribed therein cannot be imposed through circulars. Tribunal held that in absence of condition for end-use certificate in the Notification, exemption cannot be denied on that ground. Impugned order set aside, appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4807 
Join Channel 
