Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Highlights - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Income Tax
  • Direct Taxes
  • Benami Property
  • Central GST Laws
  • SGST - State GST Laws
  • Customs
  • FTP - Foreign Trade Policy
  • SEZ - Special Economic Zone
  • FEMA - Foreign Exchange Management
  • Companies Law
  • SEBI - Securities & Exchange Board of India
  • IBC - Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA - Money-Laundering
  • Indian Laws
  • Bill / Finance Bills
  • Wealth Tax
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Month:
---- All Months ----
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ----
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    Bonus-share transfer evidence defeated unexplained cash credit treatment and wiped out the consequential penalty entirely.
    Limited scrutiny cannot be enlarged beyond the notice, and a revised return must replace the original return.
    Typographical error in appellate directions could not sustain a retained section 69 addition after substantive deletion.
    Coffee processing charges incurred to make raw beans marketable were allowed as business expenditure; ad hoc agricultural disallowance fell.
    Uncorroborated third-party material cannot sustain an on-money addition without cross-examination or supporting evidence for unexplained expenditure.
    Binding interim directions barred TDS deduction on Leave Fare Concession, defeating default and interest exposure.
    Search additions without incriminating material and unexplained demonetisation cash deposits were deleted on record evidence.
    State co-operative membership controls section 80P relief; nominal and associate members do not defeat deduction.
    Commercial expediency and ad hoc disallowance issues shape treatment of business expenditure and TDS claims
    Anti-dumping duty refund follows Customs Act Section 27 when levy itself is set aside, not Section 9AA
    Tariff classification of clear float glass prevails over certificate of origin; notification benefit and penalty relief followed.
    Related-party import valuation: declared prices rejected, but unsupported residual loading was set aside for several goods
    Look Out Circular restraints on travel must satisfy proportionality and a live legal basis, not routine debt default
    Negative due date rate in commodity futures upheld; cash settlement followed contract specifications and could not be annulled.
    Clean slate principle bars pre-CIRP electricity dues and LPSC demands for fresh supply after resolution plan approval
    FEMA contravention does not automatically void a sale; challenge was barred, while ancestral partition survived.
    Strict construction of exemption notifications bars astronomy coaching from the culture exemption, with demand recomputed on a cum-tax basis.
    Voyage charter contracts treated as transportation of goods, not supply of tangible goods; tax demand and penalties fail.
    Revenue deposit refunds attract interest from each deposit date, with Section 11BB inapplicable and recalculation ordered up to refund.
    Duty paid under protest refunds attract interest only from the refund application, not from the deposit date.
❯❯
MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

    +

    Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

    NOTE:

    Highlights
    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
    Results Found:
    Show All SummariesHide All Summaries

    Highlights

    Back

    All Highlights

    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
      No Records Found

      Highlights

      Back

      All Highlights

      whatsappJoin Channel
      Showing Results for : Reset Filters

      The appellant filed bills of entry claiming exemption under...

      Tribunal Upholds Customs Exemption Refund, Rejects Re-examination for Unjust Enrichment Issue Introduced by Appeals Commissioner.

      Contents
      Summary
      Note

      Note

      -

      Bookmark

      Print

      Print

      CustomsOctober 30, 2024Case LawsAT
      The appellant filed bills of entry claiming exemption under Notification No. 46/2011-Cus, which was denied during re-assessment. The Commissioner (Appeals) rectified this mistake u/s 154 of the Customs Act, 1962, allowing the exemption. The department's stay application against this order was rejected. Consequently, a refund of Rs. 4,87,208/- was sanctioned and paid to the appellant. A show cause notice was issued to reject the refund claim, but it did not raise the unjust enrichment issue. The Commissioner (Appeals) brought in the unjust enrichment angle and remanded the matter to re-examine the issue. However, the unjust enrichment issue was never raised in the show cause notice. The Assistant Commissioner had already examined and found no unjust enrichment, which the Commissioner (Appeals) did not contradict. Hence, the Tribunal held that there was no need to re-examine the unjust enrichment issue and set aside the Commissioner (Appeals)' order as legally untenable, finding no infirmity in sanctioning the refund.

      Topics

      ActsIncome Tax