Loading...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Highlights - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Income Tax
  • Direct Taxes
  • Benami Property
  • Central GST Laws
  • SGST - State GST Laws
  • Customs
  • FTP - Foreign Trade Policy
  • SEZ - Special Economic Zone
  • FEMA - Foreign Exchange Management
  • Companies Law
  • SEBI - Securities & Exchange Board of India
  • IBC - Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA - Money-Laundering
  • Indian Laws
  • Bill / Finance Bills
  • Wealth Tax
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Month:
---- All Months ----
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ----
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
Relevance Default Date
    Belated operational creditor claim rejected for lack of verification and failure to support proof during CIRP.
    Statutory limitation under insolvency law cannot be extended by time spent in writ proceedings when alternate remedy exists.
    Limitation for personal guarantor insolvency runs from actual invocation of guarantee; earlier default notices do not start time.
    NRNR account contravention penalty upheld, but confiscation set aside for lack of reasons and no factual justification.
    PMLA committal to Special Court is mandatory once cognizance is taken; delay or trial stage cannot prevent transfer.
    Special Economic Zone notification, Approval Committee constitution and deemed Inland Container Depot status under customs law
    Anti-dumping duty notification updated to reflect a producer name change for industrial laser machine imports.
    Transshipment bond terms amended for FedEx, with revised bond validity and bank guarantee waiver retained.
    International transshipment of FCL/LCL cargo eased as Customs sets email-based coordination and handling procedures.
    Customs area declaration for Kolkata jetty extended, with pollution clearance required before fly ash loading.
    Body Worn Camera recording made mandatory for customs cargo examination at ICDs under Chennai-II Commissionerate from 01.04.2026.
    QR code Customs Passes made mandatory for Chennai Customs entry; old non-QR passes set to become invalid on stated dates.
    GST recovery stayed conditionally on filing undertaking and making statutory pre-deposit while Appellate Tribunal remains unavailable.
    GST on seigniorage fee and royalty stayed pending Supreme Court ruling; High Court applies earlier identical order.
    GST assessment remitted for fresh adjudication after taxpayer deposits part of the disputed tax and files supporting documents.
    Knowledge of liability to confiscation is essential for customs penalty under section 112(b); local purchase alone is insufficient.
    Country of Origin verification under Interim Rules must follow the prescribed retroactive mechanism before denying preferential duty benefit.
    Admitted facts need not be proved in customs adjudication where the importer contests only one limited valuation issue.
    Employment relationship excludes GST where bank pigmy agents act under control, supervision, and employment conditions.
    Prior tax payment proof can be placed through rectification before recovery to avoid double recovery of GST demand.
❯❯
Maximize Maximize Maximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

+

Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

NOTE:

Highlights
Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
Results Found:
Show All Summaries Hide All Summaries

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
No Records Found

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

whatsapp Join Channel
Showing Results for : Reset Filters

The appellant filed bills of entry claiming exemption under...

Tribunal Upholds Customs Exemption Refund, Rejects Re-examination for Unjust Enrichment Issue Introduced by Appeals Commissioner.

Contents
Summary
Note

Note

-

Bookmark

Print

Print

Customs October 30, 2024 Case Laws AT
The appellant filed bills of entry claiming exemption under Notification No. 46/2011-Cus, which was denied during re-assessment. The Commissioner (Appeals) rectified this mistake u/s 154 of the Customs Act, 1962, allowing the exemption. The department's stay application against this order was rejected. Consequently, a refund of Rs. 4,87,208/- was sanctioned and paid to the appellant. A show cause notice was issued to reject the refund claim, but it did not raise the unjust enrichment issue. The Commissioner (Appeals) brought in the unjust enrichment angle and remanded the matter to re-examine the issue. However, the unjust enrichment issue was never raised in the show cause notice. The Assistant Commissioner had already examined and found no unjust enrichment, which the Commissioner (Appeals) did not contradict. Hence, the Tribunal held that there was no need to re-examine the unjust enrichment issue and set aside the Commissioner (Appeals)' order as legally untenable, finding no infirmity in sanctioning the refund.

Topics

Acts Income Tax