Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Highlights - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Income Tax
  • Direct Taxes
  • Benami Property
  • Central GST Laws
  • SGST - State GST Laws
  • Customs
  • FTP - Foreign Trade Policy
  • SEZ - Special Economic Zone
  • FEMA - Foreign Exchange Management
  • Companies Law
  • SEBI - Securities & Exchange Board of India
  • IBC - Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA - Money-Laundering
  • Indian Laws
  • Bill / Finance Bills
  • Wealth Tax
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Month:
---- All Months ----
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ----
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
Relevance Default Date
    Proof of actual GST payment required before reimbursement claim can be examined under a government contract.
    Unconstitutional tax levy refund attracts compensatory interest from deposit date until refund, with statutory refund limits inapplicable.
    Natural justice breached when benchmark yield was fixed on undisclosed material; assessment orders were set aside and remanded.
    Transitional input tax credit under Section 140 cannot be denied by reading Section 140(5) to override pre-appointed-day credit carry forward.
    Writ maintainability and statutory pre-deposit: High Court sent the dispute to the functional appellate tribunal.
    Biodegradable bag classification turns on material and actual biodegradability; concessional GST applies only if the bags are truly biodegradable.
    Online coaching classified as training services, not OIDAR, making Rajasthan supplies intra-State for tax purposes.
    Draft assessment order must be served first before final assessment, preserving the taxpayer's DRP objection right.
    Merger of intimation into scrutiny assessment bars section 154 rectification based on an earlier adjustment.
    Reimbursement between project office and head office is a payment to self and not taxable fees for technical services.
    Distribution fee taxability remanded for fresh merits review after assessee raised a fresh claim
    Residential house test under section 54F: open land was not a house, so deduction remained available.
    Reasonable cause defeats tax audit penalty where a society's bona fide compliance lapse was found genuine and non-mala fide.
    TNMM upheld for arm's length pricing; CUP-based transfer pricing adjustment deleted on identical facts.
    Index-based derivatives are not shares under the India-Mauritius DTAA, so gains fall under the residuary residence-based article.
    Transfer pricing adjustments: pass-through costs, working capital relief, DRP binding directions, and foreign tax credit verification.
    Mechanical approval under section 153D invalidates search assessments where the approving authority fails to apply independent mind.
    Section 153C jurisdiction fails where third-party loose papers and digital traces do not establish a credible nexus with the assessee.
    Depreciation on land conversion charges denied, but penalty deleted because the underlying tax claim was fully disclosed and debatable.
    RERA compensation for extinguishment of property rights treated as long-term capital gains, not income from other sources.
❯❯
Maximize Maximize Maximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

+

Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

NOTE:

Highlights
Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
Results Found:
Show All Summaries Hide All Summaries

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
No Records Found

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

whatsapp Join Channel
Showing Results for : Reset Filters

The appellant filed bills of entry claiming exemption under...

Tribunal Upholds Customs Exemption Refund, Rejects Re-examination for Unjust Enrichment Issue Introduced by Appeals Commissioner.

Contents
Summary
Note

Note

-

Bookmark

Print

Print

Customs October 30, 2024 Case Laws AT
The appellant filed bills of entry claiming exemption under Notification No. 46/2011-Cus, which was denied during re-assessment. The Commissioner (Appeals) rectified this mistake u/s 154 of the Customs Act, 1962, allowing the exemption. The department's stay application against this order was rejected. Consequently, a refund of Rs. 4,87,208/- was sanctioned and paid to the appellant. A show cause notice was issued to reject the refund claim, but it did not raise the unjust enrichment issue. The Commissioner (Appeals) brought in the unjust enrichment angle and remanded the matter to re-examine the issue. However, the unjust enrichment issue was never raised in the show cause notice. The Assistant Commissioner had already examined and found no unjust enrichment, which the Commissioner (Appeals) did not contradict. Hence, the Tribunal held that there was no need to re-examine the unjust enrichment issue and set aside the Commissioner (Appeals)' order as legally untenable, finding no infirmity in sanctioning the refund.

Topics

Acts Income Tax