Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Highlights - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Income Tax
  • Direct Taxes
  • Benami Property
  • Central GST Laws
  • SGST - State GST Laws
  • Customs
  • FTP - Foreign Trade Policy
  • SEZ - Special Economic Zone
  • FEMA - Foreign Exchange Management
  • Companies Law
  • SEBI - Securities & Exchange Board of India
  • IBC - Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA - Money-Laundering
  • Indian Laws
  • Bill / Finance Bills
  • Wealth Tax
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Month:
---- All Months ----
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ----
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
Relevance Default Date
    Nature of debt under IBC requires fuller scrutiny before rejecting a Section 7 application on maintainability.
    Operational debt under contract survives despite missing invoices; no real pre-existing dispute blocked Section 9 insolvency proceedings.
    May 21, 2026   Case Laws Money Laundering
    Custodial interrogation and prima facie corruption material justified refusal of anticipatory bail in a serious economic offence.
    Joint venture revenue sharing with hospitals was not a taxable service; service tax demand, interest and penalty were set aside.
    Statutory notice and debt presumption failed as probable defence rebutted cheque dishonour liability
    Revised mutual fund MCR reporting expands scheme categories and data fields from June 2026 onwards.
    Entry Inward and Vessel Sail-out Clearance must not depend on physical boarding; risk-based customs boarding remains separate.
    Restoration of cancelled GST registration permitted after filing pending returns and compliance with tax obligations
    Release of detained perishable goods turns on prima facie ownership and compliance with statutory payment requirements.
    Writ jurisdiction and statutory appeal remedy: challenge sent to GSTAT with mandatory pre-deposit and notified timeline.
    Retrospective GST registration cancellation requires stated grounds and reasons; unreasoned notice and order were quashed.
    Bail condition requiring a security bond upheld as distinct from pre-deposit or bank guarantee, with review held impermissible.
    Healthcare composite supply exemption applies to inpatient treatment bundles, while outpatient medicines and excess room rent remain taxable.
    Advance ruling jurisdiction is limited to applicant's own supplies, and prior adjudication barred reconsideration of related taxability issues.
    Commercial expediency in group funding supports interest deduction and limits corporate guarantee fee attribution.
    Special search assessment overrides reassessment where reopening is based solely on third-party search material and no satisfaction note exists
    Borrowed satisfaction and invalid scrutiny notice made the reassessment unsustainable and the assessment order was quashed.
    Penalty under section 270A requires the exact limb of under-reporting or misreporting to be specified in the notice and order.
    Charitable status for a statutory port board upheld; surplus and user charges did not destroy exemption under general public utility.
    Third-party search material cannot sustain penalty without corroboration; ITAT deleted misreporting penalties based on disputed electronic records.
❯❯
Maximize Maximize Maximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

+

Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

NOTE:

Highlights
Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
Results Found:
Show All Summaries Hide All Summaries

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
No Records Found

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

whatsapp Join Channel
Showing Results for : Reset Filters

The appellant filed bills of entry claiming exemption under...

Tribunal Upholds Customs Exemption Refund, Rejects Re-examination for Unjust Enrichment Issue Introduced by Appeals Commissioner.

Contents
Summary
Note

Note

-

Bookmark

Print

Print

Customs October 30, 2024 Case Laws AT
The appellant filed bills of entry claiming exemption under Notification No. 46/2011-Cus, which was denied during re-assessment. The Commissioner (Appeals) rectified this mistake u/s 154 of the Customs Act, 1962, allowing the exemption. The department's stay application against this order was rejected. Consequently, a refund of Rs. 4,87,208/- was sanctioned and paid to the appellant. A show cause notice was issued to reject the refund claim, but it did not raise the unjust enrichment issue. The Commissioner (Appeals) brought in the unjust enrichment angle and remanded the matter to re-examine the issue. However, the unjust enrichment issue was never raised in the show cause notice. The Assistant Commissioner had already examined and found no unjust enrichment, which the Commissioner (Appeals) did not contradict. Hence, the Tribunal held that there was no need to re-examine the unjust enrichment issue and set aside the Commissioner (Appeals)' order as legally untenable, finding no infirmity in sanctioning the refund.

Topics

Acts Income Tax