Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Highlights - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Income Tax
  • Direct Taxes
  • Benami Property
  • Central GST Laws
  • SGST - State GST Laws
  • Customs
  • FTP - Foreign Trade Policy
  • SEZ - Special Economic Zone
  • FEMA - Foreign Exchange Management
  • Companies Law
  • SEBI - Securities & Exchange Board of India
  • IBC - Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA - Money-Laundering
  • Indian Laws
  • Bill / Finance Bills
  • Wealth Tax
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Month:
---- All Months ----
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ----
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
Relevance Default Date
    Rectification cannot recharacterise accepted survey disclosure as unexplained income when the issue is debatable.
    Section 87A rebate extends to long-term capital gains under section 112 absent an express statutory bar, the Tribunal holds.
    Search assessment and multiplex lease receipts: incriminating material limits additions, but commercial exploitation supported business income treatme...
    Reassessment by change of opinion fails where reopening rests on the same records and an incorrect factual premise.
    Limited scrutiny assessment cannot support additions beyond selected issues without conversion to complete scrutiny.
    Turnover filter and functional comparability in software transfer pricing upheld; limited comparables can still support arm's length benchmarking.
    Unsubstantiated commission-agent claim rejected; profit estimation from bank credits cut from 12.5% to 4% in trade income case.
    Diversion of income by overriding title shields liquidation receipts from tax where statutory application diverts realizations at source.
    Make available condition under the India-Netherlands treaty defeated FTS taxability; surcharge and cess beyond treaty rate were disallowed.
    Pre-deposit under customs appeals: filing and registration are allowed first, while entertainment can be withheld until deposit is considered.
    Anti-dumping duty time limit under Rule 18 expired, so final findings could no longer be acted upon.
    Transaction value for used machinery cannot be rejected on an unsupported local valuation when contemporaneous import evidence is unrebutted.
    Customs Broker penalty for alleged overvaluation abetment set aside absent proof of knowledge or involvement.
    Customs penalty fails without admissible proof of conscious involvement, as untested statements and bare allegations cannot sustain abetment findings.
    Town seizure of gold and silver fails without reasonable belief, foreign origin proof, or rebuttal of domestic purchase records
    Bona fide transferee protection for re-registered duty-free licences: customs demand and extended limitation were set aside.
    Locus to challenge Section 7 admission upheld where alleged loan was found to be a sham financial transaction.
    Moratorium adjustment and fraudulent trading claims remanded after material lease documents were not properly considered.
    Resolution plan approval under CIRP cannot be rejected on vague fairness concerns where statutory compliance and disclosure are established.
    Liquidation estate and title disputes: NCLAT held third-party cotton bales were excluded, leaving related remedies to the proper forum.
❯❯
Maximize Maximize Maximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

+

Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

NOTE:

Highlights
Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
Results Found:
Show All Summaries Hide All Summaries

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
No Records Found

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

whatsapp Join Channel
Showing Results for : Reset Filters

The appellant filed bills of entry claiming exemption under...

Tribunal Upholds Customs Exemption Refund, Rejects Re-examination for Unjust Enrichment Issue Introduced by Appeals Commissioner.

Contents
Summary
Note

Note

-

Bookmark

Print

Print

Customs October 30, 2024 Case Laws AT
The appellant filed bills of entry claiming exemption under Notification No. 46/2011-Cus, which was denied during re-assessment. The Commissioner (Appeals) rectified this mistake u/s 154 of the Customs Act, 1962, allowing the exemption. The department's stay application against this order was rejected. Consequently, a refund of Rs. 4,87,208/- was sanctioned and paid to the appellant. A show cause notice was issued to reject the refund claim, but it did not raise the unjust enrichment issue. The Commissioner (Appeals) brought in the unjust enrichment angle and remanded the matter to re-examine the issue. However, the unjust enrichment issue was never raised in the show cause notice. The Assistant Commissioner had already examined and found no unjust enrichment, which the Commissioner (Appeals) did not contradict. Hence, the Tribunal held that there was no need to re-examine the unjust enrichment issue and set aside the Commissioner (Appeals)' order as legally untenable, finding no infirmity in sanctioning the refund.

Topics

Acts Income Tax