Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Highlights - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Income Tax
  • Direct Taxes
  • Benami Property
  • Central GST Laws
  • SGST - State GST Laws
  • Customs
  • FTP - Foreign Trade Policy
  • SEZ - Special Economic Zone
  • FEMA - Foreign Exchange Management
  • Companies Law
  • SEBI - Securities & Exchange Board of India
  • IBC - Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA - Money-Laundering
  • Indian Laws
  • Bill / Finance Bills
  • Wealth Tax
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Month:
---- All Months ----
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ----
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
Relevance Default Date
    IGST export refund cannot be defeated by a circular inconsistent with statutory rules and binding precedent.
    Writ maintainability and alternate remedy bar applied where amalgamation plea raised for the first time in GST dispute.
    Retrospective input tax credit re-availment barred where section 16(5) extends time limit only and section 150 blocks refund.
    Reassessment based on a false non-filing assumption fails, while writ pendency may be excluded for limitation.
    Live link between seized material and assessee is essential for reopening; vague third-party paper could not sustain notice.
    Real income principle bars tax on uncertain interest from fixed deposits under prohibitory orders and pending proceedings.
    TDS under section 194J cannot by itself deny presumptive taxation under section 44AD; fresh examination required.
    Rectification of mistake apparent from record can cover wrong return entries supported by assessee records, requiring recomputation
    Transfer pricing and PF/ESI timing issues led to deletion of management fee adjustment, restricted royalty, and sustained disallowance
    Transfer pricing comparables must be functionally similar, and negative working capital adjustment was declined for captive services.
    Benefit test cannot justify nil ALP for franchise and intra-group services; TP additions were deleted, comparables partly revised.
    Clubbing spouse's derivative trading loss from gifted funds was held eligible for set-off, subject to quantum verification.
    Transfer pricing comparables, depreciation adjustment, and AE-only adjustments shaped tax outcome under scrutiny-assessment jurisdiction rules
    Functional comparability under TNMM: routine HR captive services are not KPO, and arbitrary comparables were rejected.
    Reassessment after return processing and penny stock LTCG additions fail without specific evidence linking the assessee to accommodation entries
    AIFTA preferential duty dispute over regional value content triggers interim restraint on final adjudication pending further steps
    Limitation for customs demand confined recovery period, while suppression findings revived penalty and required stock-based recomputation.
    Alternate statutory remedy bars writ challenge to customs adjudication after expiry of appeal time despite natural justice objections
    Condonation of delay in a confiscation appeal was granted where refusal would leave the appellant remediless.
    Immediate suspension of Customs Cargo Service Provider approval needs a pending or contemplated inquiry under HCCAR.
❯❯
Maximize Maximize Maximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

+

Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

NOTE:

Highlights
Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
Results Found:
Show All Summaries Hide All Summaries

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
No Records Found

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

whatsapp Join Channel
Showing Results for : Reset Filters

The appellant filed bills of entry claiming exemption under...

Tribunal Upholds Customs Exemption Refund, Rejects Re-examination for Unjust Enrichment Issue Introduced by Appeals Commissioner.

Contents
Summary
Note

Note

-

Bookmark

Print

Print

Customs October 30, 2024 Case Laws AT
The appellant filed bills of entry claiming exemption under Notification No. 46/2011-Cus, which was denied during re-assessment. The Commissioner (Appeals) rectified this mistake u/s 154 of the Customs Act, 1962, allowing the exemption. The department's stay application against this order was rejected. Consequently, a refund of Rs. 4,87,208/- was sanctioned and paid to the appellant. A show cause notice was issued to reject the refund claim, but it did not raise the unjust enrichment issue. The Commissioner (Appeals) brought in the unjust enrichment angle and remanded the matter to re-examine the issue. However, the unjust enrichment issue was never raised in the show cause notice. The Assistant Commissioner had already examined and found no unjust enrichment, which the Commissioner (Appeals) did not contradict. Hence, the Tribunal held that there was no need to re-examine the unjust enrichment issue and set aside the Commissioner (Appeals)' order as legally untenable, finding no infirmity in sanctioning the refund.

Topics

Acts Income Tax