Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1161 to 1180 of 95957 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Refund claim for service tax paid under reverse charge mechanism on transportation of raw material was rejected. The appellant had self-assessed and filed returns without contesting, later filing refund claims directly. It was held that refund proceedings cannot modify assessments already made as per Supreme Court's ruling in ITC Limited case. Delhi High Court in BT (India) Pvt. Ltd. case held ITC Limited's rationale applies to service tax refunds too. Since appellant did not challenge self-assessments wherein no refund was due, refund claim was correctly rejected despite potential entitlement otherwise. Refund proceedings are execution proceedings, cannot alter assessments, like decree cannot be modified in execution.
Refund claim for service tax paid under reverse charge mechanism on transportation of raw material was rejected. The appellant had self-assessed and filed returns without contesting, later filing refund claims directly. It was held that refund proceedings cannot modify assessments already made as per Supreme Court's ruling in ITC Limited case. Delhi High Court in BT (India) Pvt. Ltd. case held ITC Limited's rationale applies to service tax refunds too. Since appellant did not challenge self-assessments wherein no refund was due, refund claim was correctly rejected despite potential entitlement otherwise. Refund proceedings are execution proceedings, cannot alter assessments, like decree cannot be modified in execution.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.