Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Offence u/ss 420/406/506/120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. Complainant/Respondent No. 2 induced by accused to part with money on false pretext of return and repayment assurance. FIR registration mandatory u/s 154 Cr.P.C. if information discloses cognizable offence. No bar under Cr.P.C. for FIR registration while complaint pending before Magistrate. Petitioner No. 2's claim of signing blank documents untenable as educated businessman. Facts warrant no quashing of FIR against Petitioner No. 2 u/ss 420/406/506/120B IPC. Petition dismissed.
Offence u/ss 420/406/506/120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. Complainant/Respondent No. 2 induced by accused to part with money on false pretext of return and repayment assurance. FIR registration mandatory u/s 154 Cr.P.C. if information discloses cognizable offence. No bar under Cr.P.C. for FIR registration while complaint pending before Magistrate. Petitioner No. 2's claim of signing blank documents untenable as educated businessman. Facts warrant no quashing of FIR against Petitioner No. 2 u/ss 420/406/506/120B IPC. Petition dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.