Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Page of 4813
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3301 to 3320 of 96257 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Offence u/ss 420/406/506/120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. Complainant/Respondent No. 2 induced by accused to part with money on false pretext of return and repayment assurance. FIR registration mandatory u/s 154 Cr.P.C. if information discloses cognizable offence. No bar under Cr.P.C. for FIR registration while complaint pending before Magistrate. Petitioner No. 2's claim of signing blank documents untenable as educated businessman. Facts warrant no quashing of FIR against Petitioner No. 2 u/ss 420/406/506/120B IPC. Petition dismissed.
Offence u/ss 420/406/506/120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. Complainant/Respondent No. 2 induced by accused to part with money on false pretext of return and repayment assurance. FIR registration mandatory u/s 154 Cr.P.C. if information discloses cognizable offence. No bar under Cr.P.C. for FIR registration while complaint pending before Magistrate. Petitioner No. 2's claim of signing blank documents untenable as educated businessman. Facts warrant no quashing of FIR against Petitioner No. 2 u/ss 420/406/506/120B IPC. Petition dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4813 
Join Channel 
