Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Offence u/ss 420/406/506/120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. Complainant/Respondent No. 2 induced by accused to part with money on false pretext of return and repayment assurance. FIR registration mandatory u/s 154 Cr.P.C. if information discloses cognizable offence. No bar under Cr.P.C. for FIR registration while complaint pending before Magistrate. Petitioner No. 2's claim of signing blank documents untenable as educated businessman. Facts warrant no quashing of FIR against Petitioner No. 2 u/ss 420/406/506/120B IPC. Petition dismissed.
Offence u/ss 420/406/506/120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. Complainant/Respondent No. 2 induced by accused to part with money on false pretext of return and repayment assurance. FIR registration mandatory u/s 154 Cr.P.C. if information discloses cognizable offence. No bar under Cr.P.C. for FIR registration while complaint pending before Magistrate. Petitioner No. 2's claim of signing blank documents untenable as educated businessman. Facts warrant no quashing of FIR against Petitioner No. 2 u/ss 420/406/506/120B IPC. Petition dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.