Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
381 to 400 of 96046 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The food product containing 22.94% fat cannot be classified as Margarine under chapter heading 1517 10 as per Food Safety and Standards Regulations, 2011 which requires fat content not less than 80% mass/mass for Margarine. The product is a preparation of vegetable fat specifically covered under 1517 90 90, not under residuary chapter heading 2106. Since it is a preparation of vegetable oil without animal fat, GST rate applicable is 5% as per S. No. 89 of Schedule I to Notification No. 1/2017 - IGST(Rate) dated 28.06.2017. The Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling upheld this classification and GST rate.
The food product containing 22.94% fat cannot be classified as Margarine under chapter heading 1517 10 as per Food Safety and Standards Regulations, 2011 which requires fat content not less than 80% mass/mass for Margarine. The product is a preparation of vegetable fat specifically covered under 1517 90 90, not under residuary chapter heading 2106. Since it is a preparation of vegetable oil without animal fat, GST rate applicable is 5% as per S. No. 89 of Schedule I to Notification No. 1/2017 - IGST(Rate) dated 28.06.2017. The Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling upheld this classification and GST rate.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.