Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
Non-payment of tax for Assessment Years 2005-06 and 2006-07 - Liability to pay interest u/s 234B. Prior to the insertion of proviso to Section 209(1), if the payer defaulted in deducting tax at source from payments to non-residents, the non-resident was not absolved from paying taxes, and the question of advance tax payment did not arise. The Supreme Court disposed of the appeal due to low tax effect, keeping any question of law open. Pending applications were also disposed of.
Non-payment of tax for Assessment Years 2005-06 and 2006-07 - Liability to pay interest u/s 234B. Prior to the insertion of proviso to Section 209(1), if the payer defaulted in deducting tax at source from payments to non-residents, the non-resident was not absolved from paying taxes, and the question of advance tax payment did not arise. The Supreme Court disposed of the appeal due to low tax effect, keeping any question of law open. Pending applications were also disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.