Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Misdeclaration of imported polished marble slabs as unpolished slabs. Excess quantity found during physical verification. Customs duty demanded along with interest and penalty imposed. Importer paid duty, interest, and penalty, requested closure u/s 28(5) and 28(6) of Customs Act, 1962. Commissioner held show cause notice premature for duty demand, proceedings concluded u/s 125. Assessment provisional u/s 18(2), not final. Section 28(4) inapplicable, proceedings rightly concluded u/s 125 for provisional assessments. Mis-declaration covered under case law. Provisional release doesn't affect adjudication jurisdiction. Mentioning wrong provision doesn't vitiate proceedings if authority has requisite power. Redemption fine imposable u/s 125 when goods released under bond. Penalty imposed u/s 112(a), omission of Section 114(AA) penalty. Matter remanded to determine nature of proceedings, allow Section 28(5) and 28(6) benefit if assessment not provisional, else finalize assessment, then demand duty u/s 28(4) and allow amnesty.
Misdeclaration of imported polished marble slabs as unpolished slabs. Excess quantity found during physical verification. Customs duty demanded along with interest and penalty imposed. Importer paid duty, interest, and penalty, requested closure u/s 28(5) and 28(6) of Customs Act, 1962. Commissioner held show cause notice premature for duty demand, proceedings concluded u/s 125. Assessment provisional u/s 18(2), not final. Section 28(4) inapplicable, proceedings rightly concluded u/s 125 for provisional assessments. Mis-declaration covered under case law. Provisional release doesn't affect adjudication jurisdiction. Mentioning wrong provision doesn't vitiate proceedings if authority has requisite power. Redemption fine imposable u/s 125 when goods released under bond. Penalty imposed u/s 112(a), omission of Section 114(AA) penalty. Matter remanded to determine nature of proceedings, allow Section 28(5) and 28(6) benefit if assessment not provisional, else finalize assessment, then demand duty u/s 28(4) and allow amnesty.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
