Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Non-discharge of service tax - extended period invoked, service tax demanded - penalties imposed u/ss 77 and 78 of Finance Act, 1994 - appellant providing taxable maintenance, repair, manpower recruitment and supply services - appellant computed and paid service tax due - lack of knowledge and status as petty contractor pleaded - authorities imposed heavy penalties despite appellant's compliance before adjudication - undisputed findings regarding appellant's status and compliance - no justification for not considering Section 80 benefit and waiving penalties - fit case for waiving penalties u/ss 77 and 78 in terms of Section 80 - appeal partly allowed, setting aside penalties imposed on appellant.
Non-discharge of service tax - extended period invoked, service tax demanded - penalties imposed u/ss 77 and 78 of Finance Act, 1994 - appellant providing taxable maintenance, repair, manpower recruitment and supply services - appellant computed and paid service tax due - lack of knowledge and status as petty contractor pleaded - authorities imposed heavy penalties despite appellant's compliance before adjudication - undisputed findings regarding appellant's status and compliance - no justification for not considering Section 80 benefit and waiving penalties - fit case for waiving penalties u/ss 77 and 78 in terms of Section 80 - appeal partly allowed, setting aside penalties imposed on appellant.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.