Depreciation and routine compliance expenses disallowance did not prove inaccurate particulars or misreporting; penalty sustained only on foreign trav...
Page of 4827
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3461 to 3480 of 96536 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Non-discharge of service tax - extended period invoked, service tax demanded - penalties imposed u/ss 77 and 78 of Finance Act, 1994 - appellant providing taxable maintenance, repair, manpower recruitment and supply services - appellant computed and paid service tax due - lack of knowledge and status as petty contractor pleaded - authorities imposed heavy penalties despite appellant's compliance before adjudication - undisputed findings regarding appellant's status and compliance - no justification for not considering Section 80 benefit and waiving penalties - fit case for waiving penalties u/ss 77 and 78 in terms of Section 80 - appeal partly allowed, setting aside penalties imposed on appellant.
Non-discharge of service tax - extended period invoked, service tax demanded - penalties imposed u/ss 77 and 78 of Finance Act, 1994 - appellant providing taxable maintenance, repair, manpower recruitment and supply services - appellant computed and paid service tax due - lack of knowledge and status as petty contractor pleaded - authorities imposed heavy penalties despite appellant's compliance before adjudication - undisputed findings regarding appellant's status and compliance - no justification for not considering Section 80 benefit and waiving penalties - fit case for waiving penalties u/ss 77 and 78 in terms of Section 80 - appeal partly allowed, setting aside penalties imposed on appellant.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
