Jurisdictional facts in certificate-of-origin discrepancies can support customs show-cause proceedings, leaving factual explanations for departmental ...
Market value for captive electricity consumption follows industrial consumer tariffs, supporting profit computation for the power generation deduction...
Proceedings u/s 153A were initiated based on alleged incriminating material found during search, however, the material relied upon was a laptop recovered from Mumbai during a search operation against a different firm, not from the premises of the assessee. While the warrants of authorization u/s 132 were validly issued mentioning the registered office and partners of the assessee firm, no incriminating material was actually found from the assessee's premises to justify proceedings u/s 153A. The High Court held that in absence of any incriminating material recovered from the assessee's premises, the proceedings initiated u/s 153A could not be sustained and were therefore quashed.
Proceedings u/s 153A were initiated based on alleged incriminating material found during search, however, the material relied upon was a laptop recovered from Mumbai during a search operation against a different firm, not from the premises of the assessee. While the warrants of authorization u/s 132 were validly issued mentioning the registered office and partners of the assessee firm, no incriminating material was actually found from the assessee's premises to justify proceedings u/s 153A. The High Court held that in absence of any incriminating material recovered from the assessee's premises, the proceedings initiated u/s 153A could not be sustained and were therefore quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
