Specialized Investment Fund distribution now requires dedicated certification, while transitional recognition preserves existing qualified distributor...
Overlapping GST proceedings require Central and State authorities to designate one competent authority for coordinated adjudication of the same matter...
Composite healthcare supplies retain exemption when patient care is the contract's essential character, despite payment through an implementing agency...
Proceedings u/s 153A were initiated based on alleged incriminating material found during search, however, the material relied upon was a laptop recovered from Mumbai during a search operation against a different firm, not from the premises of the assessee. While the warrants of authorization u/s 132 were validly issued mentioning the registered office and partners of the assessee firm, no incriminating material was actually found from the assessee's premises to justify proceedings u/s 153A. The High Court held that in absence of any incriminating material recovered from the assessee's premises, the proceedings initiated u/s 153A could not be sustained and were therefore quashed.
Proceedings u/s 153A were initiated based on alleged incriminating material found during search, however, the material relied upon was a laptop recovered from Mumbai during a search operation against a different firm, not from the premises of the assessee. While the warrants of authorization u/s 132 were validly issued mentioning the registered office and partners of the assessee firm, no incriminating material was actually found from the assessee's premises to justify proceedings u/s 153A. The High Court held that in absence of any incriminating material recovered from the assessee's premises, the proceedings initiated u/s 153A could not be sustained and were therefore quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
