Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2121 to 2140 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Notice u/s 142(1) was issued to petitioner, but respondent failed to state when it was delivered/served, violating principles of natural justice. Impugned order deserves to be set aside adopting justice-oriented approach, granting petitioner opportunity to reply to Section 142 notice. Respondent entitled to claim interest on demand amount if order passed against petitioner after remand due to lapse of four years from impugned order.
Notice u/s 142(1) was issued to petitioner, but respondent failed to state when it was delivered/served, violating principles of natural justice. Impugned order deserves to be set aside adopting justice-oriented approach, granting petitioner opportunity to reply to Section 142 notice. Respondent entitled to claim interest on demand amount if order passed against petitioner after remand due to lapse of four years from impugned order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
