Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Highlights - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Income Tax
  • Direct Taxes
  • Benami Property
  • Central GST Laws
  • SGST - State GST Laws
  • Customs
  • FTP - Foreign Trade Policy
  • SEZ - Special Economic Zone
  • FEMA - Foreign Exchange Management
  • Companies Law
  • SEBI - Securities & Exchange Board of India
  • IBC - Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA - Money-Laundering
  • Indian Laws
  • Bill / Finance Bills
  • Wealth Tax
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Month:
---- All Months ----
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ----
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
Relevance Default Date
    Effective notice under GST requires more than portal-only service after registration cancellation; adverse orders were quashed.
    GST registration cancellation requires precise notice and a reasoned order; non-speaking cancellation was quashed for natural justice breach.
    Exemption for cotton seed oil cake used as cattle feed upheld; GST demand quashed and refund directed.
    Rule 86A time limit ends electronic credit ledger blocking after one year, requiring immediate unblocking.
    Alternative modes of service under GST law: tribunal required portal, email, and speed post service to ensure notice reached respondents.
    Interest provision and General Body Meeting expenses: award set aside, liability fell away, but statutory meeting costs remained deductible.
    Limitation for scrutiny notices to amalgamated companies remains strict; prior observations did not create jurisdiction for fresh assessment.
    Direct nexus test for interest deduction fails where borrowed funds were used for share and property investments.
    Curative 10% stamp duty tolerance band applies retrospectively, blocking section 56 deeming addition on marginal valuation difference.
    Third-party search material cannot support a regular assessment under section 143(3) without reassessment procedure and approval.
    Co-operative society deduction on interest from co-operative banks upheld under section 80P(2)(d), with section 80P(4) limited in effect.
    Section 54 deduction for under-construction flat upheld where allotment and timely payment showed sufficient investment in a residential house.
    Bona fide legal claim cannot support misreporting penalty where facts were fully disclosed and quantum appeal was not filed.
    Safe harbour tolerance under Section 43CA applies to DVO valuation after substitution of stamp duty value, deleting the addition.
    Prospective application of section 115BBE bars enhanced tax rate on surrendered income for AY 2017-18.
    Section 68 cash credit addition deleted where partner capital was only transferred by journal entry into unsecured loan account.
    Schedule-B coverage and customs broker penalty fail where Ergotamine preparation was outside the notified entry.
    Reverse burden in smuggled gold cases upheld where concealed recovery, fabrication, and corroborative evidence sustained confiscation and penalties.
    Customs investigation deposits remain pre-deposits, not duty, and must be refunded with only statutory interest.
    Director removal process cannot be blocked by civil court where statutory jurisdiction and injunction tests are not satisfied.
❯❯
Maximize Maximize Maximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

+

Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

NOTE:

Highlights
Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
Results Found:
Show All Summaries Hide All Summaries

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
No Records Found

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

whatsapp Join Channel
Showing Results for : Reset Filters
Central Excise

Denial of CENVAT credit distributed by the Head Office (Input...

CENVAT Credit Denial Overturned: Full Credit Permitted for Pre-2016 Distribution Without Proportional Requirement.

Contents
Summary
Note

Note

-

Bookmark

Print

Print

Central Excise October 26, 2024 Case Laws AT
Denial of CENVAT credit distributed by the Head Office (Input Service Distributor) to a unit during April to June 2012. The denial was based on the ground that the credit was not distributed proportionately among all units based on their respective turnovers, resulting in excess credit distribution to the unit. The key points are: Prior to the amendment effective from 01.04.2016, there was no compulsion on the assessee to distribute the credit proportionately or to all units. Even if the entire credit was distributed to one unit, it cannot be denied. The situation was revenue neutral as the other units paid more duty than the attributed credit. The CESTAT Ahmedabad held that 100% credit availed by the appellant was in order as per the existing CENVAT Credit Rules during the relevant period. Based on judgments, it is settled that even if the credit is distributed to one unit only during the relevant period, it cannot be denied. The impugned order is set aside, and the appeal is allowed.

Topics

Acts Income Tax