Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Highlights - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Income Tax
  • Direct Taxes
  • Benami Property
  • Central GST Laws
  • SGST - State GST Laws
  • Customs
  • FTP - Foreign Trade Policy
  • SEZ - Special Economic Zone
  • FEMA - Foreign Exchange Management
  • Companies Law
  • SEBI - Securities & Exchange Board of India
  • IBC - Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA - Money-Laundering
  • Indian Laws
  • Bill / Finance Bills
  • Wealth Tax
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Month:
---- All Months ----
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ----
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
Relevance Default Date
    Review jurisdiction limits bar rehearing where no error apparent exists in the DTVSV Form-2 dispute.
    Transfer pricing adjustment on AMP spend deleted where no arrangement showed an international transaction with the associated enterprise.
    Transfer pricing comparability: government-linked and functionally dissimilar companies were excluded; disputed loss-making comparable was remanded.
    Net profit estimation on unaccounted sales limits tax addition, permits telescoping of cash, and avoids double addition for expenditure.
    Borrowed satisfaction and vague reasons invalidated reassessment where no live nexus linked material to alleged escapement.
    Penalty under section 271D fails without surviving reassessment basis or independent proof of cash loan acceptance.
    Transfer pricing comparables and income computation errors were remitted for fresh adjudication after functional dissimilarity was found.
    Unaccounted sales and bogus purchase additions: tribunal limits taxation to profit element, rejects blanket add-ons, and allows telescoping.
    Bogus purchase additions fail where documentary evidence is unrebutted and suspicion is not backed by independent enquiry.
    Purposive interpretation of residential house exemption: unregistered purchase agreement alone does not defeat relief, but investment must be verified...
    Defective notice format, rejection of books, and unexplained cash deposits were addressed through technical and remand-based tax rulings.
    Employee benefit, share premium, ESOP and subsidiary loss claims turn on evidence, valuation and commercial expediency
    Charitable trust taxed at normal slab rates where trustees had no income share and public-benefit activities were involved.
    Revision under section 263 requires error and prejudice; claimed deductions and losses were upheld on lawful assessment and supporting records.
    Jurisdiction transfer under section 127 rendered reassessment void ab initio when the original officer acted without authority.
    Specific tariff classification for n-Hexane prevailed over motor spirit treatment, with Chapter 29 classification upheld.
    Customs investigation communication cannot replace adjudication; liability must be by show cause notice and final proceedings
    Customs valuation based only on NIDB data was held unsustainable, and enhanced duty payment did not bar appeal.
    Steamer agent penalty and retained onboard cargo confiscation rejected for lack of mens rea and import character
    Zircon sand classified as concentrate, exemption denied, duty upheld, cross-examination challenge rejected, and penalty set aside.
❯❯
Maximize Maximize Maximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

+

Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

NOTE:

Highlights
Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
Results Found:
Show All Summaries Hide All Summaries

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
No Records Found

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

whatsapp Join Channel
Showing Results for : Reset Filters
Central Excise

Denial of CENVAT credit distributed by the Head Office (Input...

CENVAT Credit Denial Overturned: Full Credit Permitted for Pre-2016 Distribution Without Proportional Requirement.

Contents
Summary
Note

Note

-

Bookmark

Print

Print

Central Excise October 26, 2024 Case Laws AT
Denial of CENVAT credit distributed by the Head Office (Input Service Distributor) to a unit during April to June 2012. The denial was based on the ground that the credit was not distributed proportionately among all units based on their respective turnovers, resulting in excess credit distribution to the unit. The key points are: Prior to the amendment effective from 01.04.2016, there was no compulsion on the assessee to distribute the credit proportionately or to all units. Even if the entire credit was distributed to one unit, it cannot be denied. The situation was revenue neutral as the other units paid more duty than the attributed credit. The CESTAT Ahmedabad held that 100% credit availed by the appellant was in order as per the existing CENVAT Credit Rules during the relevant period. Based on judgments, it is settled that even if the credit is distributed to one unit only during the relevant period, it cannot be denied. The impugned order is set aside, and the appeal is allowed.

Topics

Acts Income Tax