Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Highlights - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Income Tax
  • Direct Taxes
  • Benami Property
  • Central GST Laws
  • SGST - State GST Laws
  • Customs
  • FTP - Foreign Trade Policy
  • SEZ - Special Economic Zone
  • FEMA - Foreign Exchange Management
  • Companies Law
  • SEBI - Securities & Exchange Board of India
  • IBC - Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA - Money-Laundering
  • Indian Laws
  • Bill / Finance Bills
  • Wealth Tax
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Month:
---- All Months ----
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ----
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
Relevance Default Date
    SEZ procurement and diversion findings set aside after inadmissible statements, weak data reliance, and burden-of-proof errors.
    Declared value for used garments needs reliable comparables; restricted second-hand imports without licence may still attract confiscation and moderat...
    Concessional CVD for cement turns on intended retail sale, not printed RSP or packaging, while substituted valuation and extended limitation failed.
    Proportionality in Customs Broker regulation: procedural lapse did not justify licence revocation, but penalty survived for poor compliance.
    Preferential exemption and certificate of origin cannot be denied by unilateral recomputation of local value added content.
    Customs Broker diligence failures justified forfeiture of security deposit, while deliberate collusion was not proved.
    Abetment and fraudulent export penalties fail where no actual importer is proved and import cases fall outside Section 114AA.
    Foreign security seizure under FEMA upheld in part, with subscription-based shareholding treated as actionable investment outside India.
    June 4, 2026   Case Laws Money Laundering
    Jurisdictional challenge to provisional attachment succeeded where reasons for urgent attachment lacked objective statutory basis.
    June 4, 2026   Case Laws Money Laundering
    Retention of seized cash under PMLA upheld where source remained unexplained and natural justice challenge failed.
    June 4, 2026   Case Laws Money Laundering
    Statutory limits on substituting attached immovable property with monetary security under Rule 5 were reaffirmed, and the request was dismissed.
    Charter party demurrage and reverse charge tax demands fail where charges are contractual and tax was already paid by Indian establishment
    Composite tea estate lease treated as agricultural arrangement; CESTAT rejected splitting it into taxable service categories.
    Centralised registration and work-order substance defeated service tax demand on jurisdiction and manpower supply classification.
    Ayurvedic therapeutic treatment held outside health and fitness services, and exempt as health care services by a clinical establishment.
    Import policy for specified silver HS codes now requires DGFT authorisation for permitted imports through nominated agencies and IIBX channels.
    Board of Trade expands non-official membership and sets trade policy, export strategy and streamlining priorities.
    Infrastructure sub-sector businesses specified for Schedule V eligibility under the Income-tax Act, 2025, from Gazette publication.
    India-Oman CEPA added to HBP procedures, enabling certificate of origin issuance through authorised agencies.
    Preferential Certificate of Origin framework expanded for India-Oman CEPA through updated authorised issuing agencies.
❯❯
Maximize Maximize Maximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

+

Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

NOTE:

Highlights
Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
Results Found:
Show All Summaries Hide All Summaries

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
No Records Found

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

whatsapp Join Channel
Showing Results for : Reset Filters
Central Excise

Denial of CENVAT credit distributed by the Head Office (Input...

CENVAT Credit Denial Overturned: Full Credit Permitted for Pre-2016 Distribution Without Proportional Requirement.

Contents
Summary
Note

Note

-

Bookmark

Print

Print

Central Excise October 26, 2024 Case Laws AT
Denial of CENVAT credit distributed by the Head Office (Input Service Distributor) to a unit during April to June 2012. The denial was based on the ground that the credit was not distributed proportionately among all units based on their respective turnovers, resulting in excess credit distribution to the unit. The key points are: Prior to the amendment effective from 01.04.2016, there was no compulsion on the assessee to distribute the credit proportionately or to all units. Even if the entire credit was distributed to one unit, it cannot be denied. The situation was revenue neutral as the other units paid more duty than the attributed credit. The CESTAT Ahmedabad held that 100% credit availed by the appellant was in order as per the existing CENVAT Credit Rules during the relevant period. Based on judgments, it is settled that even if the credit is distributed to one unit only during the relevant period, it cannot be denied. The impugned order is set aside, and the appeal is allowed.

Topics

Acts Income Tax