Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
Section 271AAA(2) of the Income Tax Act mandates that for avoiding penalty, the assessee company must not only disclose undisclosed income during a statement recorded u/s 132(4) but also specify and substantiate the manner in which that income was derived. The High Court held that the assessee/appellant failed to meet these requirements, leading to the dismissal of the appeal against the levy of penalty u/s 271AAA.
Section 271AAA(2) of the Income Tax Act mandates that for avoiding penalty, the assessee company must not only disclose undisclosed income during a statement recorded u/s 132(4) but also specify and substantiate the manner in which that income was derived. The High Court held that the assessee/appellant failed to meet these requirements, leading to the dismissal of the appeal against the levy of penalty u/s 271AAA.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.